Fiveable

๐ŸŽฌPerformance Studies Unit 8 Review

QR code for Performance Studies practice questions

8.1 Speech acts and performative utterances

๐ŸŽฌPerformance Studies
Unit 8 Review

8.1 Speech acts and performative utterances

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
๐ŸŽฌPerformance Studies
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Speech acts are powerful tools in language, allowing us to do things with words. They're not just about saying stuff โ€“ they're about making stuff happen. From promises to orders, speech acts shape our social world.

In performance, speech acts take center stage. They create realities, challenge norms, and build relationships. Whether it's a wedding vow or a political speech, these acts have real-world consequences beyond the words themselves.

Speech Acts and Performance

Types of Speech Acts

  • Speech acts are utterances that perform actions through language, such as making promises, giving orders, or declaring statements
  • Speech acts can be categorized into three types:
    • Locutionary: the literal meaning of the utterance
    • Illocutionary: the intended meaning or force behind the utterance
    • Perlocutionary: the effect or consequence of the utterance on the listener
  • The concept of speech acts was introduced by philosopher J.L. Austin in his book "How to Do Things with Words" (1962)

Speech Acts in Performance Contexts

  • In performance contexts, speech acts can be used to create, maintain, or challenge social realities, relationships, and power structures
  • Examples of speech acts in performance contexts include:
    • A minister saying "I now pronounce you husband and wife" at a wedding ceremony
    • An actor delivering a monologue that reveals a character's inner thoughts and motivations
    • A politician making a promise to voters during a campaign speech
  • The effectiveness of speech acts in performance contexts depends on factors such as the speaker's delivery, the audience's reception, and the cultural and institutional norms surrounding the performance

Language and Action in Performance

Performative Contexts

  • Performative contexts are situations where language is used to enact or constitute reality, rather than merely describing it
  • In performative contexts, the utterance itself is the action, and the speaker's intention and the context in which the utterance is made are crucial to its meaning and effect
  • Examples of performative contexts include:
    • Religious rituals (baptisms, weddings, funerals)
    • Legal proceedings (courtroom testimony, signing contracts)
    • Political speeches (inaugural addresses, State of the Union speeches)
    • Artistic performances (theater, poetry readings, stand-up comedy)

Relationship between Language and Action

  • The relationship between language and action in performative contexts is dynamic and reciprocal, as language shapes action and action shapes language
  • In performative contexts, language has the power to:
    • Create new realities (declaring a couple married)
    • Influence behavior (giving orders or instructions)
    • Express emotions and attitudes (apologizing, thanking, praising)
    • Establish social roles and identities (appointing someone to a position)
  • At the same time, the effectiveness of language in performative contexts depends on:
    • The actions and reactions of the participants (the audience's applause or laughter)
    • The physical and social setting of the performance (the stage, the courtroom, the pulpit)
    • The cultural and historical context surrounding the performance (the genre conventions, the social norms, the political climate)

Constative vs Performative Utterances

Definitions and Distinctions

  • Constative utterances are statements that describe or report on reality and can be evaluated as true or false, such as "The sky is blue"
  • Performative utterances, also known as performatives, are utterances that perform actions and cannot be evaluated as true or false, such as "I now pronounce you husband and wife"
  • The distinction between constative and performative utterances is not always clear-cut, as some utterances can have both constative and performative aspects, depending on the context and the speaker's intention
  • Examples of utterances that can be both constative and performative include:
    • "I promise to pay you back" (describing a future action vs. committing to the action)
    • "I apologize for my behavior" (expressing regret vs. performing the act of apologizing)
    • "I find the defendant guilty" (stating an opinion vs. rendering a verdict)

Felicity Conditions for Performatives

  • Felicity conditions are the necessary conditions for a performative utterance to be successful and effective
  • The felicity conditions for performatives include:
    • The speaker's authority (a judge pronouncing a sentence)
    • The appropriateness of the context (a wedding ceremony in a church)
    • The sincerity of the speaker's intention (a genuine apology vs. a sarcastic one)
    • The correct and complete execution of the performative formula (saying "I do" vs. "I might")
  • If the felicity conditions are not met, the performative utterance may be considered "infelicitous" or unsuccessful, such as:
    • A child "marrying" their playmates in a pretend ceremony
    • A person saying "I promise" without intending to keep the promise
    • A non-ordained person attempting to perform a religious rite

Speech Acts and Social Dynamics

Creating and Maintaining Social Roles and Relationships

  • Speech acts can create, maintain, or challenge social roles, identities, and relationships, such as when a person is appointed to a position of authority through a speech act
  • Examples of speech acts that create or maintain social roles and relationships include:
    • A boss giving instructions to an employee
    • A teacher praising a student's work
    • A friend making a promise to another friend
  • The effectiveness of these speech acts depends on factors such as:
    • The speaker's perceived authority or credibility
    • The listener's acceptance or resistance to the speaker's role
    • The history and nature of the relationship between the speaker and the listener

Exercising and Resisting Power through Speech Acts

  • Speech acts can also be used to exercise or resist power, such as when a person gives an order or refuses to comply with an order
  • Examples of speech acts that exercise or resist power include:
    • A police officer ordering a suspect to surrender
    • A protester chanting slogans against a government policy
    • A customer demanding to speak to a manager about poor service
  • The impact of these speech acts on power dynamics depends on factors such as:
    • The relative social status and power of the speaker and the listener
    • The institutional and cultural norms surrounding the exercise of power
    • The strategies and resources available to the speaker and the listener to assert or challenge power

Interdisciplinary Study of Speech Acts and Social Dynamics

  • The study of speech acts in relation to social interactions and power dynamics is interdisciplinary, drawing on fields such as:
    • Linguistics (the structure and meaning of language)
    • Sociology (the study of social structures and interactions)
    • Anthropology (the study of cultural practices and beliefs)
    • Political science (the study of power relations and governance)
  • Interdisciplinary approaches to speech acts and social dynamics can provide insights into:
    • The role of language in shaping social identities and hierarchies
    • The cultural variations in the use and interpretation of speech acts
    • The political implications of speech acts in public discourse and policy-making
    • The ethical dimensions of speech acts in interpersonal communication and professional settings