Quadratic programming builds on linear programming by introducing quadratic terms in the objective function. This allows for modeling more complex relationships between variables, like diminishing returns or trade-offs between competing goals.
The standard form includes a quadratic objective function with linear constraints. Key components are the Q matrix for quadratic coefficients, c vector for linear terms, and Ax โค b for constraints. This versatile framework applies to many real-world optimization problems.
Quadratic Programming Standard Form
Mathematical Representation
- Minimize or maximize quadratic objective function subject to linear constraints
- represents symmetric matrix of quadratic coefficients
- denotes vector of linear coefficients
- signifies vector of decision variables
- Linear constraints expressed as
- represents matrix of constraint coefficients
- denotes vector of constraint constants
- Non-negativity constraints ensure feasibility of solution
Characteristics and Special Cases
- Feasible region formed by intersection of all constraints creates convex set
- Positive semi-definite matrices ensure convexity of objective function
- Convexity guarantees global optimality of local minimum (portfolio optimization)
- Indefinite matrices may lead to multiple local optima (facility location problems)
Objective Function and Constraints
Objective Function Components
- Quadratic expression minimized or maximized contains linear and quadratic terms
- matrix represents quadratic interactions between variables (production costs)
- vector represents linear coefficients of decision variables (profit margins)
- Objective function models complex relationships (diminishing returns in marketing)
- Captures trade-offs between competing objectives (risk vs. return in finance)
Constraint Types and Formulation
- Linear inequalities or equalities restrict feasible region of solution
- Equality constraints expressed as (resource allocation)
- Inequality constraints expressed as or (production limits)
- Bound constraints limit individual variables (inventory levels)
- Separating bound constraints from general linear constraints improves computational efficiency
Real-World Problems in Quadratic Form
Problem Formulation Process
- Identify decision variables representing quantities to be optimized (production quantities)
- Formulate objective function expressing goal in terms of decision variables
- Include both linear and quadratic terms (profit maximization with diminishing returns)
- Determine constraints by identifying limitations or requirements (resource availability)
- Express constraints as linear equalities or inequalities (machine capacity limits)
- Convert all expressions to matrix and vector notation aligning with standard form
- Verify formulation accurately represents original problem (portfolio optimization)
Common Applications
- Portfolio optimization balancing risk and return
- Production planning with economies of scale
- Facility location problems considering distance and demand
- Traffic flow optimization in transportation networks
- Resource allocation in project management
- Machine learning algorithms (support vector machines)
Linear vs Quadratic Programming
Objective Function Differences
- Linear programming involves linear objective function (maximize profit)
- Quadratic programming includes both linear and quadratic terms (minimize risk)
- Quadratic terms model more complex relationships between variables (economies of scale)
- Quadratic programming captures diminishing returns or increasing costs (marketing effectiveness)
Solution Characteristics
- Linear programming optimal solutions always occur at vertices of feasible region
- Quadratic programming optimal solutions may lie in interior of feasible region
- Interior solutions in quadratic programming reflect trade-offs between competing objectives
- Quadratic programming solutions often more realistic for real-world scenarios (portfolio allocation)
Computational Complexity
- Linear programming solved efficiently using simplex method or interior point methods
- Quadratic programming requires more complex algorithms (active set methods)
- Convexity of quadratic programming problems crucial for global optimality
- Non-convex quadratic programs may have multiple local optima, requiring global optimization techniques