Fiveable

๐ŸŒบHawaiian Studies Unit 12 Review

QR code for Hawaiian Studies practice questions

12.3 Sovereignty Movements and Models of Self-Determination

๐ŸŒบHawaiian Studies
Unit 12 Review

12.3 Sovereignty Movements and Models of Self-Determination

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
๐ŸŒบHawaiian Studies
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Hawaiian sovereignty and self-determination are complex issues rooted in history and culture. Native Hawaiians seek control over their lands, resources, and governance to preserve their identity and shape their future. Various models propose different levels of autonomy, from integration to full independence.

Efforts for Hawaiian independence have spanned generations, from Queen Liliuokalani's resistance to modern movements. Challenges include legal obstacles, diverse community opinions, and economic dependencies. International support, particularly through UN declarations, bolsters Native Hawaiian rights and cultural preservation efforts.

Understanding Sovereignty and Self-Determination

Concept of Hawaiian sovereignty

  • Sovereignty encompasses political independence and self-governance allowing Native Hawaiians to make decisions for their nation
  • Authority over land, resources, and internal affairs empowers Native Hawaiians to control their destiny
  • Recognition as distinct indigenous people preserves cultural identity and practices
  • Restoration of ancestral lands protects natural resources for future generations
  • Self-determination of political status ensures Native Hawaiian voices are heard in governance

Models of Hawaiian self-determination

  • Nation-within-a-nation model grants limited autonomy within U.S. (similar to Native American tribes)
  • Independent nation-state model seeks complete political independence with international recognition
  • Free association model establishes voluntary partnership with U.S. while maintaining unilateral termination rights
  • Integration model increases political representation within existing state structures without separate governing entity

Historical Context and Contemporary Efforts

Efforts for Hawaiian independence

  • Queen Liliuokalani resisted 1893 overthrow to maintain Hawaiian monarchy
  • Home Rule movement in early 1900s advocated for Native Hawaiian political control
  • 1970s Hawaiian cultural renaissance revitalized language, hula, and traditional practices
  • Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) established in 1978 to improve Native Hawaiian wellbeing
  • Ka Lahui Hawaii initiated nation-building efforts to create a Native Hawaiian government
  • Hawaiian Kingdom Government attempts to restore pre-overthrow monarchy
  • Akaka Bill proposed federal recognition of Native Hawaiians as indigenous people
  • Nation of Hawaii declared independence to establish sovereign Hawaiian state

Challenges of Hawaiian self-governance

  • U.S. federal and state courts pose legal obstacles to sovereignty claims
  • Native Hawaiian community holds diverse opinions on self-determination approaches
  • Economic dependencies on U.S. complicate transition to self-governance
  • Land ownership and historical claims create complex legal and social issues
  • Growing public awareness increases support for indigenous rights
  • Increased political representation in state government amplifies Native Hawaiian voices
  • Potential for negotiated settlements with U.S. government offers path to reconciliation
  • Expansion of Hawaiian language and cultural education programs strengthens cultural identity

International support for Hawaiian rights

  • United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) supports self-determination
  • UNDRIP recognizes indigenous rights to land, resources, and cultural practices
  • International law establishes self-determination as fundamental human right
  • Decolonization processes obligate administering powers to support indigenous autonomy
  • International forums provide platform for Native Hawaiians to advocate for rights
  • Global pressure encourages U.S. to adhere to international indigenous rights standards
  • International support bolsters cultural revitalization and language preservation efforts
  • Non-binding nature of UNDRIP limits enforceability of indigenous rights declarations
  • Powerful nations often resist enforcement of international law in domestic affairs