Fiveable

๐Ÿ“ˆFinancial Accounting II Unit 12 Review

QR code for Financial Accounting II practice questions

12.1 Changes in Accounting Principles

๐Ÿ“ˆFinancial Accounting II
Unit 12 Review

12.1 Changes in Accounting Principles

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
๐Ÿ“ˆFinancial Accounting II
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Changes in accounting principles can significantly impact a company's financial reporting. This topic explores when and why companies switch methods, covering examples like shifting from LIFO to FIFO inventory valuation or altering depreciation approaches for fixed assets.

Implementing these changes involves careful timing, disclosure, and communication. The notes detail how companies should quantify and report the financial impact, considering retrospective or prospective application methods to ensure comparability across reporting periods.

Situations for Changing Accounting Principles

Determining the Need for Change

  • Changes in accounting principles are necessary when a company determines that an alternative accounting method is preferable to the current method being used
  • Management must provide justification for the change in accounting principles, demonstrating that the new method is preferable and results in improved financial reporting
  • Situations that may lead to a change in accounting principles include:
    • Issuance of new accounting standards by regulatory bodies (FASB, IASB)
    • Changes in the company's business operations
    • Determination that the new method provides more reliable and relevant financial information

Examples of Accounting Principle Changes

  • Switching from LIFO to FIFO inventory valuation
  • Changing the depreciation method for fixed assets (straight-line to accelerated)
  • Adopting a new revenue recognition policy (percentage-of-completion to completed contract)
  • Modifying the treatment of leases (operating to finance leases)
  • Altering the method for accounting for investments (cost method to equity method)

Implementing Accounting Principle Changes

Timing and Disclosure Requirements

  • When a company decides to change an accounting principle, it must first determine the appropriate timing for the change, which is typically at the beginning of a fiscal year or interim period
  • The company must disclose the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principles in the financial statements for the period in which the change is adopted
  • The disclosure should include a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, if applicable
  • If the change in accounting principles is mandated by a new accounting standard, the company must follow the specific transition guidance provided by the standard-setting body

Communication and Consistency

  • The company must communicate the change to its auditors and ensure that the new accounting principle is consistently applied across all relevant financial statements and disclosures
  • Internal controls should be updated to reflect the new accounting principle and ensure its proper implementation
  • Training may be necessary for accounting personnel to understand and apply the new principle correctly
  • The company should also consider the impact of the change on its budgeting, forecasting, and performance measurement processes

Financial Statement Impact of Changes

Quantifying and Disclosing the Impact

  • Changes in accounting principles can have a significant impact on a company's financial statements, affecting the comparability of financial information across periods
  • The impact of the change should be quantified and disclosed in the financial statements, including the effect on net income, retained earnings, and relevant balance sheet accounts
  • If the change is applied retrospectively, the cumulative effect of the change on retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presented should be disclosed

Comparability Considerations

  • If the change is applied retrospectively, the company must restate prior-period financial statements to reflect the new accounting principle as if it had always been in effect
    • Retrospective application ensures comparability of financial information across all presented periods
  • If the change is applied prospectively, the financial statements will reflect the new accounting principle from the date of adoption forward, without restating prior periods
    • Prospective application may result in a lack of comparability between pre- and post-change periods
    • The company should disclose the reasons why retrospective application is impracticable, if applicable

Retrospective vs Prospective Application

Retrospective Application

  • Retrospective application involves applying the new accounting principle to all prior periods presented in the financial statements as if the new principle had always been used
  • This approach requires the restatement of previously issued financial statements to reflect the change
  • Retrospective application enhances the comparability of financial information across all presented periods
  • Restatement may be complex and time-consuming, requiring the recalculation of financial statement line items and disclosures

Prospective Application

  • Prospective application involves applying the new accounting principle only to events and transactions occurring after the date of the change, without restating prior periods
  • Under this approach, the financial statements will reflect the old accounting principle for periods before the change and the new principle for periods after the change
  • Prospective application may be appropriate when it is impracticable to determine the prior-period effects of the change or when required by specific transition guidance
  • This approach may result in a lack of comparability between pre- and post-change periods, which should be clearly communicated to financial statement users

Factors Influencing the Choice of Application Method

  • The choice between retrospective and prospective application depends on factors such as:
    • Nature of the change in accounting principle
    • Availability of information necessary to restate prior periods
    • Specific requirements of the relevant accounting standards
    • Practicability of determining the prior-period effects of the change
  • Companies must provide clear disclosures about the method of application chosen and the reasons behind their decision to ensure transparency for financial statement users