Fiveable

๐Ÿ’ฑBlockchain and Cryptocurrency Unit 13 Review

QR code for Blockchain and Cryptocurrency practice questions

13.4 Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Solutions

๐Ÿ’ฑBlockchain and Cryptocurrency
Unit 13 Review

13.4 Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Solutions

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
๐Ÿ’ฑBlockchain and Cryptocurrency
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Cryptocurrency wallets come in two main flavors: custodial and non-custodial. Custodial wallets rely on a third party to manage your keys, while non-custodial wallets put you in full control. Each has its pros and cons, so it's crucial to understand the differences.

Custody solutions cater to different needs, from individual users to big institutions. They involve key management, insurance options, and regulatory compliance. The choice between custodial and non-custodial solutions impacts security, convenience, and legal responsibilities in the crypto world.

Wallet Types

Custodial and Non-Custodial Wallets

  • Custodial wallets involve a third party holding and managing private keys on behalf of the user
    • Relies on trust in the custodian to secure funds and execute transactions correctly
    • Examples include exchanges (Coinbase, Binance) and some mobile wallets (Blockchain.info, Xapo)
  • Non-custodial wallets give users full control over their private keys and funds
    • Users are solely responsible for securing their keys and managing their cryptocurrency
    • Includes hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor), desktop wallets (Exodus, Electrum), and some mobile wallets (Trust Wallet, Mycelium)
  • Third-party custody refers to entrusting private keys and funds to an external entity, such as an exchange or custodial service provider
  • Self-custody means the user maintains control of their private keys and is responsible for safeguarding their own cryptocurrency holdings

Custody Solutions

Institutional Custody and Insurance

  • Institutional custody caters to the needs of large organizations, such as hedge funds, family offices, and corporations investing in cryptocurrency
    • Provides secure storage, insurance, and regulatory compliance
    • Examples include Coinbase Custody, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Bakkt
  • Insurance for custodial solutions helps protect users against losses due to theft, hacks, or insider misconduct
    • Custodians may obtain insurance policies to cover potential losses and instill confidence in their services
    • Insurance coverage varies among providers and may not cover all scenarios (e.g., individual user negligence)

Key Ownership and Management

  • Key ownership determines who has control over the private keys associated with a cryptocurrency wallet
    • In custodial setups, the third party owns and manages the keys on behalf of the user
    • Non-custodial wallets give users full ownership and control of their private keys
  • Proper key management is crucial for maintaining security and access to funds
    • Includes securely storing backups, using strong passwords, and implementing multi-signature schemes when applicable
    • Hardware security modules (HSMs) are often used by institutions for secure key storage and management

Regulatory Compliance

  • Regulatory compliance ensures that cryptocurrency custody solutions adhere to applicable laws and regulations
    • Includes anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements
    • Custodians must implement proper screening, monitoring, and reporting procedures
  • Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction and may involve obtaining licenses or registering with regulatory bodies
    • In the US, custody providers may need to register as a money services business (MSB) or trust company
    • European Union's Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) imposes stricter requirements on crypto custodians
  • Key ownership and control have legal implications in terms of liability and responsibility
    • Non-custodial wallets place full responsibility on the user, while custodial solutions involve shared liability
  • Third-party custody agreements should clearly define roles, obligations, and liabilities of all parties involved
    • Includes specifying security measures, insurance coverage, and procedures for handling disputes or insolvency
  • Institutional custody providers must navigate complex legal frameworks and ensure compliance with applicable regulations
    • May involve obtaining specialized licenses, implementing robust security measures, and maintaining detailed record-keeping