Fiveable

🇺🇸AP US History Unit 6 Review

QR code for AP US History practice questions

6.12 Controversies over the Role of Government

🇺🇸AP US History
Unit 6 Review

6.12 Controversies over the Role of Government

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
Verified for the 2026 exam
Verified for the 2026 examWritten by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
🇺🇸AP US History
Unit & Topic Study Guides
Pep mascot

During the Gilded Age (1870s-1890s), Americans argued about how much the government should be involved in the economy. As factories and big businesses grew rapidly, some people wanted government to stay out of business affairs, while others wanted more rules to control powerful corporations. These debates shaped real policies that affected everyday Americans and set patterns that would influence American politics for decades.

image
Political commentary on big business, image courtesy of Bryan-College Station Chronicle

Economic Philosophies and Approaches

The Gilded Age saw a big fight between different ideas about how the economy should work. Business leaders usually wanted less government involvement, while farmers, workers, and reformers often wanted more rules to protect people against powerful corporations.

Laissez-faire supporters believed government should stay out of the economy:

  • "Laissez-faire" means "let them do as they please" in French
  • They thought businesses should operate without government rules
  • They believed free markets would naturally fix economic problems
  • They saw economic competition as natural and good
  • They opposed government help during hard economic times

Government intervention supporters argued:

  • Unregulated businesses created harmful monopolies
  • Government needed to protect the public against powerful corporations
  • Economic downturns required government action to help suffering people
  • Government should make sure competition was fair
Laissez-faire BeliefsGovernment Intervention Beliefs
Free markets solve problems naturallyMarkets need rules to be fair
Competition creates the best resultsMonopolies hurt consumers and workers
Government should stay out of businessGovernment should protect the public
Economic hardship weeds out weak businessesEconomic hardship causes needless suffering
Success comes from individual effortSuccess depends partly on fair rules

Social Darwinism gave laissez-faire ideas a scientific-sounding excuse. It wrongly applied Darwin's ideas about natural selection to human society, suggesting that rich people were naturally superior and government help for poor people would weaken society. These ideas were popular among wealthy business owners who benefited from limited rules.

Pep mascot
more resources to help you study

Federal Economic Policies

Despite the popularity of laissez-faire thinking, the government actually did quite a bit to help businesses grow during this period. At the same time, growing problems with monopolies and corruption eventually led to the first significant business regulations.

How government helped business growth:

  • Gave railroad companies huge amounts of free land
  • Put high taxes on imported goods to protect American industries
  • Kept immigration open to ensure cheap labor
  • Sent troops to break up worker strikes
  • Limited legal responsibility for corporations

Early business regulations:

  • Interstate Commerce Act (1887) – controlled railroad rates
  • Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) – made monopolies illegal
  • Pendleton Civil Service Act (1883) – reduced government corruption

The Interstate Commerce Act created America's first federal regulatory agency to oversee railroad rates and practices. The Sherman Antitrust Act declared monopolies illegal, though it wasn't strongly enforced until the early 1900s. Both laws represented important steps toward greater government involvement in the economy, even if they didn't change things overnight.

Monetary Policy Debates

One of the biggest economic debates of the Gilded Age was about money – specifically, whether American currency should be backed by gold alone or by both gold and silver. This affected millions of Americans, particularly farmers and people in debt who were suffering under the gold standard's effects.

"Hard Money" supporters (mostly bankers and lenders) wanted:

  • Gold standard where paper money was backed by gold
  • Stable currency to make businesses feel confident
  • Limited inflation to protect their investments
  • Policies that generally helped northeastern banks and businesses

"Easy Money" supporters (mostly farmers and borrowers) wanted:

  • More money in circulation through silver coinage or paper currency
  • Rising prices to help farmers and make debts easier to repay
  • Policies that would help western and southern regions

The "Crime of 1873" happened when Congress stopped making silver coins, effectively putting the US on the gold standard. This decision made things harder for farmers and debtors, while helping banks and creditors. The fight over gold versus silver became a major political issue, leading to the rise of the Populist Party and playing a central role in the 1896 presidential election.

Regional Economic Conflicts

Government economic policies created tensions between different regions of the country. Policies that helped one region often hurt another, leading to political conflicts between North and South, East and West.

Northern industrial interests wanted:

  • High taxes on imported goods to protect their factories
  • Gold standard money policies
  • Government support for industrial growth

Southern agricultural interests wanted:

  • Lower taxes on imports to reduce prices and help exports
  • More money in circulation to raise crop prices
  • Limited government economic regulation

Eastern financial centers wanted:

  • Gold standard and conservative money policy
  • National banking system controlled by Eastern banks
  • Limited inflation to protect lenders

Western farmers and miners wanted:

  • "Free silver" to create more money
  • Government control of railroad rates
  • Federal programs to help farmers

These regional tensions shaped political parties, elections, and government policies throughout the Gilded Age. The debate wasn't just about abstract economic theories – it was about whose interests would be served by government policy.

Foreign Economic Policy

As American production grew beyond what Americans could consume, the government increasingly looked to foreign markets. This led to more active government involvement in international affairs to protect American economic interests.

The government promoted economic expansion abroad by:

  • Seeking new markets for American products
  • Building influence in Latin America
  • Opening Asian markets, especially China and Japan
  • Acquiring territories like Hawaii, Philippines, and Puerto Rico
  • Establishing naval bases to support trade

Business leaders pushed for an "Open Door" policy in China to ensure American companies could compete with European powers there. The government also organized the first Pan-American Conference in 1889 to build stronger trade relationships with Latin American nations. These economic interests played a major role in America's growing global influence at the end of the 19th century.

Legacy of Gilded Age Economic Debates

The debates over government's role in the economy during the Gilded Age set important patterns for the future. While laissez-faire ideas dominated much of this period, growing problems with monopolies, worker unrest, and economic inequality gradually built support for increased regulation.

These controversies laid the groundwork for the Progressive Era reforms that would follow in the early 20th century, when the federal government would take a more active role in regulating business and addressing social problems. Many economic issues that first emerged during the Gilded Age – like monopoly power, worker rights, and government's role in managing the economy – continue to be debated in American politics today.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is laissez-faire and why did people support it during the Gilded Age?

Laissez-faire is the idea that government should minimally interfere in the economy—letting markets, competition, and private enterprise operate with few regulations or taxes. During the Gilded Age people supported it because it fit dominant beliefs: Social Darwinism suggested economic competition rewarded the “fit,” and ideas like Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth argued wealthy industrialists would use their fortunes for public good without gov’t help. Business leaders, many politicians, and courts favored laissez-faire because it encouraged rapid industrial growth, investment, and cheap consumer goods. Opponents pointed to trusts and worker unrest (Pullman Strike, Haymarket) as reasons for more regulation, which led to laws like the Sherman Antitrust and Interstate Commerce Acts. For more on Topic 6.12, see Fiveable’s study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

What were the main controversies about government's role in the economy in the late 1800s?

In the late 1800s the big fights were over how much the federal government should regulate the economy. One side (laissez-faire, Social Darwinism, Gospel of Wealth) argued minimal intervention: markets and competition drive growth and philanthropy could solve inequality (Carnegie, Rockefeller). Opponents wanted more government action to curb corporate power and protect workers—leading to the Interstate Commerce Act (regulate rail rates), the Sherman Antitrust Act (limit trusts), and responses to strikes (Pullman Strike, Haymarket) that raised questions about labor rights and federal intervention. Other flashpoints: tariff debates, civil service reform (Pendleton Act), and Populist demands (bimetallism, direct election of senators, William Jennings Bryan). For AP tasks, be ready to explain continuity/change in government’s role and use specific laws/events as evidence. Review this topic’s Fiveable study guide for summaries (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

Why did some Americans oppose government intervention during economic downturns in the Gilded Age?

Many Americans opposed government intervention during Gilded Age downturns because of a mix of ideology, economics, and culture. Laissez-faire beliefs held that markets self-correct and that intervention distorted competition and long-run growth. Influential ideas like Social Darwinism and Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth argued that wealth concentration reflected merit and that charity or market rewards—not government aid—were proper responses. Business leaders and many politicians (e.g., Grover Cleveland) feared that subsidies, tariffs, or relief would create dependence, encourage corruption, or undermine private enterprise. Events like the Pullman Strike and Haymarket Affair made some worry government aid would favor one class over another, so they preferred limited federal action. For AP prep, make sure you can connect these arguments to policy debates (Interstate Commerce Act, Sherman Antitrust Act) and use specific examples on the exam (short answers/LEQ/DBQ). See the Topic 6.12 study guide for review (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd). For practice, try problems at (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

How did the government's role in the economy change from the Civil War to 1900?

After the Civil War the federal government moved from a mostly laissez-faire stance to a more active—but still limited—role in the economy. Continuity: pro-business ideas like Social Darwinism and the Gospel of Wealth justified minimal regulation and big trusts (Rockefeller, Carnegie). Change: by the 1880s–90s Congress and presidents started intervening selectively—Interstate Commerce Act (1887) regulated rail rates, the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) targeted monopolies, Pendleton Act (1883) reformed civil service, and presidents (Cleveland, later McKinley/Republicans) sometimes used federal force in labor disputes (Pullman Strike). Tariff debates and the Populist challenge pushed calls for more government action. By 1900 the trend was toward regulatory tools and stronger federal influence over commerce (and overseas markets), a shift you should explain as continuity + change on AP free-response and short-answer tasks. For this Topic 6.12 review, see Fiveable’s study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and try practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

What's the difference between laissez-faire supporters and people who wanted more government regulation?

Laissez-faire supporters wanted minimal government interference in the economy—they believed free markets and competition drove growth. Think Social Darwinism and Andrew Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth: wealthy industrialists argued inequality was natural and that private charity, not government, should address social problems. Opponents wanted more regulation to curb monopolies, protect workers, and ensure fair markets. They pushed laws like the Sherman Antitrust Act and Interstate Commerce Act and supported government responses to strikes (Pullman) and labor unrest (Haymarket) to limit corporate power and protect labor. For the AP exam, frame this as a continuity/change question (CED Learning Objective J): continuity = long-standing belief in markets; change = rising federal regulation during the Gilded Age. For the Fiveable Topic 6.12 study guide, see (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd). For extra practice, use Fiveable’s APUSH practice problems (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

I'm confused about why businessmen wanted less government but also wanted help with foreign markets - can someone explain?

Think of it as selective government: Gilded Age businessmen wanted laissez-faire at home—low taxes, few regulations, and courts that protected contracts—because that maximized profits and allowed trusts (Rockefeller, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan) to grow. But once U.S. industry produced more than the domestic market could absorb, those same businessmen wanted government help opening foreign markets—diplomacy, navy support (Mahan), tariffs that protected home producers, and policies that kept trade routes and overseas markets accessible. So they argued for small government domestically but supported active government abroad to secure markets and resources. That tension shows up in debates over tariffs, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and expansion after 1890. For AP review, link this to CED keywords like laissez-faire, Social Darwinism, Mahan, and tariff debates (see the Topic 6.12 study guide on Fiveable: https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd). Practice applying this in DBQ/LEQ prompts—use the practice problems (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history) to get faster at weaving evidence and causation.

What were the specific arguments for and against government intervention in the Gilded Age economy?

For: reformers argued government should correct market failures, limit corporate power, and protect workers and consumers. Progress included the Interstate Commerce Act (regulate railroads), Sherman Antitrust Act (target monopolies), Pendleton Act (civil service reform), and federal responses to strikes/riots showing need for legal order. Intellectual support came from critiques of Social Darwinism and calls for more government responsibility to prevent abuses; Andrew Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth even urged philanthropy and social stewardship. Examples you can use on the exam: Pullman Strike, Haymarket, Populist Party demands, tariff debates, and antitrust enforcement. Against: laissez-faire supporters said free competition and minimal regulation spurred economic growth, innovation, and recovery from downturns. Social Darwinists framed wealth as natural selection; business leaders (Rockefeller, Morgan) argued regulation would stifle investment. Presidents like Grover Cleveland favored limited intervention and balanced budgets. Use these tensions as DBQ/LEQ evidence—cite laws, strikes, Populist/Populist leaders (Bryan), and court responses. See the Topic 6.12 study guide for concise examples (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and grab practice questions at (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

How did foreign policy connect to economic policy during the Gilded Age?

Foreign policy in the Gilded Age was tightly linked to economic policy: industrial overproduction, tariff protection, and the search for raw materials pushed the U.S. to look overseas for markets and resources. Business leaders and policymakers (influenced by Social Darwinism and the Gospel of Wealth) backed a stronger navy (Mahan) and overseas footholds to protect shipping and open markets—think Alaska, Hawaii, the Spanish-American War, and the Philippines. Diplomatic moves like the Open Door Notes sought equal access to China’s markets, while presidents used “big stick”/policing language to secure stability for American investments (Roosevelt). For AP exam prep, use these cause-effect links in DBQs/LEQs: cite Mahan, Hay, cartoons, plus events (Spanish-American War, Annexation of Hawaii) as evidence. Review the Topic 6.12 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

Why did the US government start looking for markets in Asia and Latin America during this time?

Because U.S. industry was growing faster than domestic demand after 1865, politicians and business leaders looked overseas for buyers and resources. The 1890 census declared the frontier “closed,” so leaders worried about limits to territorial expansion and new markets. Strategic thinkers like Alfred Thayer Mahan argued a strong navy and overseas bases were needed to protect trade (CED KC-6.1.I.E.ii). Cultural ideas—Social Darwinism and the “civilizing” missionary impulse—also pushed expansion. Events like the Spanish-American War, the annexation of Hawaii, and the push for an “Open Door” in China showed how government used diplomacy and military power to secure markets and investment. These causes show up on AP prompts and the 1865–1910 DBQ documents (e.g., Mahan, Hay). For a focused review, see the Topic 6.12 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and practice 1,000+ AP questions at (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

What were the long-term effects of laissez-faire policies on American workers and businesses?

Laissez-faire policies in the Gilded Age meant minimal government interference, which long-term helped big businesses grow fast but hurt many workers. For businesses: it encouraged consolidation and trusts (Rockefeller, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan), huge economies of scale, and often monopolistic control of markets until public pressure led to laws like the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) and the Interstate Commerce Act (1887). For workers: low wages, long hours, dangerous conditions, and weak legal protections spurred strikes (Pullman, Haymarket) and boosted union organizing and Populist/Progressive demands for reform. Over time the imbalance produced a shift in government role—from hands-off to limited regulation and civil-service reform (Pendleton) as voters and reformers pushed back. On the APUSH exam, this topic connects directly to Learning Objective J (continuity/change in government economic role). For a focused study guide, see Fiveable’s Topic 6.12 page (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

How do I write a DBQ essay about government regulation debates in the Gilded Age?

Start your DBQ with a clear, one-sentence thesis that answers the prompt about government regulation debates in the Gilded Age (e.g., how and why views on laissez-faire vs. regulation changed). Contextualize briefly: rapid industrialization, rise of big business, labor unrest, and growing Populist/Progressive demands. Use at least four documents to support an argument and cite one outside fact (Sherman Antitrust Act 1890, Interstate Commerce Act 1887, Pullman Strike 1894, or Populist platform/William Jennings Bryan). For two documents, explain POV/purpose (e.g., business leader uses Social Darwinism to defend laissez-faire; labor leader pushes for gov’t intervention after strikes). Organize body paragraphs by theme (economic, political, social) and compare continuity/change in government role. End with a synthesis linking Gilded Age debates to Progressive reforms. For topical review use the Fiveable study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd), unit overview (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6), and practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

Did laissez-faire actually promote economic growth like supporters claimed it would?

Short answer: partly—yes in some ways, but not as cleanly or fairly as laissez-faire supporters claimed. Why: 19th-century laissez-faire ideas (plus Social Darwinism and the Gospel of Wealth) encouraged minimal regulation, which let businesses invest, consolidate, and innovate. That helped rapid industrial growth: railroads, steel, oil, finance, and new technologies expanded U.S. GDP and global trade. But limits matter: unfettered competition produced huge monopolies, price-fixing, and crises (Panics of the era), severe worker exploitation, and frequent strikes (Pullman, Haymarket). Those market failures and political backlash led to regulatory steps like the Interstate Commerce Act (1887) and Sherman Antitrust Act (1890). So laissez-faire helped growth quantitatively but created inequalities and instability that forced government intervention. For AP review, connect this to Topic 6.12 keywords and reforms—and check the Fiveable study guide for this topic (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd). Practice questions are at (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

What happened when the government didn't intervene during economic panics in the 1870s and 1890s?

When the federal government mostly stood aside during the panics of the 1870s (Panic of 1873) and 1890s (Panic of 1893), the results were sharp economic pain and political backlash. Banks and railroads collapsed, factories closed, unemployment soared, wages fell, and local relief systems were overwhelmed. That hardship fueled strikes (notably the Pullman Strike, 1894), riots, and growing support for agrarian and labor movements—especially the Populist Party—which demanded government action on currency, rail regulation, and tariffs. Critics said laissez-faire policies and presidents like Grover Cleveland didn’t do enough, pushing reforms such as the Interstate Commerce Act and later antitrust efforts. On the AP exam, expect these events in short-answer or LEQ prompts about continuity/change in government role and responses to industrial crises. For a focused review, see the Topic 6.12 study guide (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd), the Unit 6 overview (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6), and practice questions (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).

How does the Gilded Age government role debate compare to New Deal policies later?

Short answer: In the Gilded Age most politicians and elites favored laissez-faire ideas (Social Darwinism, Gospel of Wealth) and limited federal action—Congress passed a few regulatory laws (Interstate Commerce Act 1887, Sherman Antitrust Act 1890) but enforcement was weak. Populists and labor unrest (Pullman Strike, Haymarket) pushed for more government help, but the dominant debate was minimal federal intervention in the economy. By the New Deal (1933–39) that debate shifted: the federal government accepted active intervention to stabilize markets, provide relief, regulate finance (FDIC, SEC), and support labor. That’s a major change in scope and expectations of federal power—continuity is the ongoing tension over limiting concentrated economic power (antitrust then; regulation and social welfare later). For AP essays, this is a CCOT/comparison prompt: show both continuity (concern about big business) and change (from weak regula­tion to robust federal programs). Review Topic 6.12 here (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6/controversies-over-role-government-gilded-age/study-guide/CU4ireSXmjF3ZkbKgQYd) and Unit 6 overview (https://library.fiveable.me/ap-us-history/unit-6). For practice, use Fiveable’s AP practice bank (https://library.fiveable.me/practice/ap-us-history).