Abnormal psychology research uses experimental and correlational designs to study mental disorders. Experimental designs manipulate variables to establish cause-effect relationships, while correlational designs examine natural relationships between variables without manipulation.
Each approach has strengths and limitations. Experimental designs offer control and internal validity but may lack real-world applicability. Correlational designs allow studying variables that can't be manipulated but can't prove causation. Both contribute valuable insights to understanding psychological disorders.
Research Designs in Abnormal Psychology
Experimental vs correlational research designs
- Experimental research designs manipulate one or more independent variables to observe their effect on a dependent variable, allowing researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables by requiring random assignment of participants to different conditions or groups (testing the effectiveness of a new therapy for depression, comparing the effects of different medications on anxiety symptoms)
- Correlational research designs investigate the relationship between two or more variables without manipulating them, observing naturally occurring variables and their relationships but not establishing cause-and-effect relationships, only associations or correlations (examining the relationship between stress levels and the severity of OCD symptoms, investigating the correlation between childhood trauma and the development of PTSD)
Advantages of experimental research
- Allows for the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships between variables by enabling researchers to control extraneous variables that may influence the results
- Provides a high level of internal validity, meaning that the observed effects can be attributed to the manipulated variable
- May lack external validity, meaning the results may not generalize to real-world settings or populations
- Ethical concerns may arise when manipulating variables related to psychological disorders
- Some variables related to abnormal psychology cannot be manipulated for ethical or practical reasons, limiting the scope of experimental research
Correlational research in abnormal psychology
- Examines the relationship between two or more variables without manipulating them by measuring the variables of interest and analyzing the data to determine the strength and direction of the relationship
- Investigates relationships such as:
- Social media use and symptoms of depression and anxiety
- Genetic predisposition and likelihood of developing a specific psychological disorder
- Sleep quality and the severity of bipolar disorder symptoms
Strengths of correlational studies
- Allows researchers to study variables that cannot be manipulated for ethical or practical reasons, providing insights into the relationships between variables in real-world settings
- Can be used to generate hypotheses for future experimental research and are often less expensive and time-consuming compared to experimental research
- Cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables, only associations, with the potential for confounding variables that may influence the relationship between the variables of interest
- Possibility of reverse causality, where the assumed dependent variable may actually be influencing the assumed independent variable
- Limited ability to control extraneous variables, which may affect the accuracy of the results