Verified for the 2025 AP European History exam•Last Updated on April 1, 2025
The Age of Absolutism and the Age of Constitutionalism represent two competing political visions for power and governance in early modern Europe. While absolutism centered authority in the hands of the monarch, constitutionalism distributed power across governing institutions with legal limitations on the monarchy. These two approaches emerged in response to crises of legitimacy, war, and shifting economic structures in the 16th through 18th centuries.
Absolutism refers to a system of government where all sovereign power resides with the monarch, unchecked by legislative bodies or constitutional constraints. Monarchs like Louis XIV of France or Peter the Great of Russia used divine right theory to justify centralized rule. Their goals were to suppress noble dissent, control the military, dominate religious life, and expand their influence abroad.
In contrast, Constitutionalism developed as a response to unchecked royal power, emphasizing legal limits on authority and representation through parliaments. The best example is England, particularly after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy under William and Mary.
Absolutist rulers drew legitimacy from divine right theorists like Jacques Bossuet, who argued monarchs were chosen by God and should not be challenged. Thomas Hobbes also supported absolutism in his work Leviathan, describing life without a strong sovereign as “nasty, brutish, and short.”
In contrast, constitutionalism was underpinned by thinkers like John Locke, who emphasized natural rights and argued that governments derived their legitimacy from the consent of the governed. His Two Treatises of Government (1689) became foundational to liberal thought in England and later revolutions across Europe and the Americas.
Louis XIV of France built the Palace of Versailles to weaken the nobility and control their influence, enforced one faith by revoking the Edict of Nantes, and centralized the bureaucracy under the supervision of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who used mercantilist policies to fund Louis’s wars and grandiose court. Louis was the state—no law, army, or church operated without his will.
England developed a radically different model. After the execution of Charles I and the failure of Oliver Cromwell’s Protectorate, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 placed William and Mary on the throne. They signed the English Bill of Rights, which limited monarchical power, protected the rights of Parliament, and enshrined trial by jury and habeas corpus. The result was a constitutional monarchy in which Parliament controlled taxation, law-making, and military funding.
England’s government became a partnership between the monarchy and the legislature, setting a precedent for modern representative democracy. Over time, the Prime Minister and Cabinet system emerged, further reducing the personal power of the monarch.
Key Difference:
Whereas absolutist monarchs like Louis XIV said, “I am the state,” constitutional governments declared that law was above the king.
Under absolutist rule, societies remained rigid and hierarchical, with a strong nobility and limited mobility for the lower classes. In France, nobles retained legal privileges, tax exemptions, and high social status, even if political power shifted to the monarchy.
Meanwhile, in constitutional states, the rise of a middle class (bourgeoisie) began to challenge the old feudal structure. In England, merchant and gentry classes gained increasing influence in Parliament and local governance.
Absolutist monarchs often enforced religious conformity to strengthen their control. In Catholic France, Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, expelling Huguenots and promoting one faith under one crown.
In contrast, constitutional monarchies leaned toward religious pluralism and tolerance, especially following civil wars. In England, while the Anglican Church remained official, toleration for dissenters slowly expanded in the 18th century.
Absolutist rulers relied heavily on mercantilism—an economic theory emphasizing state control of trade and accumulation of wealth through exports and colonialism. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis XIV’s finance minister, expanded France’s manufacturing base and enforced high tariffs on imports.
In constitutional states, however, economic policy began to favor free markets and private enterprise. England's government protected property rights, encouraged investment, and became a center of banking and finance.
Absolutist states maintained large standing armies loyal to the monarch. Louis XIV waged nearly continuous wars to expand France’s borders, often at great economic cost. Peter the Great modernized Russia’s army with Western techniques and created a powerful navy from scratch.
By contrast, constitutional governments were more limited in waging war, since they required parliamentary approval for taxes and military funding. This didn’t prevent wars, but it often restrained rulers’ ambitions.
Category | Absolutism (France, Russia) | Constitutionalism (England) |
---|---|---|
Power Structure | Centralized in monarch | Shared between monarch and parliament |
Religion | Enforced uniformity (e.g., Catholicism) | Gradual religious toleration |
Economy | State-controlled, mercantilist | Capitalist growth and property protections |
Social Hierarchy | Rigid hierarchy, nobles above law | Middle-class participation through Parliament |
Law & Rights | Law made by king; no guaranteed rights | Law limits king; individual rights recognized |
While absolutism and constitutionalism both emerged from the political chaos of the 16th and 17th centuries, they offered fundamentally different visions of governance. Absolutist monarchs like Louis XIV and Peter the Great believed the strength of the state depended on a strong monarch. Constitutionalist reformers in England, however, pushed for a system where power was limited and balanced.
These competing systems not only shaped European history but also laid the groundwork for later revolutions—such as the French and American Revolutions—that challenged the idea of monarchic power altogether.
🎥 Watch: AP European History - Absolutism vs Constitutionalism